16 February 2021
  • Share

As part of our Thought Leaders series, Mewburn Ellis Partner Robert Watson explores the reinvigoration of the UK Design protection system.

Forward: features discuss and celebrate the best of innovation and exploration from the scientific and entrepreneurial worlds.

The UK established an independent system of design law with the Calico Printers’ Act of 1787, which conferred a short term of copyright to merchants creating valuable fabric patterns. Registrations were introduced back in 1839, when the second Copyright of Designs Act 1839 allowed for the protection of “ornamental” designs.

This independence was lost with the harmonisation of design law across Europe arising from the European Designs Directive (98/71/EC) in 1998. This was followed by the introduction of a central registration system in 2004 via the Council Regulation on Community Designs (6/2002/EC).

When the European design system began, it offered a very attractive way to achieve design protection across European member states. This led to a drop of about 60% in filings at the UK IPO between 2002 and 2005 (from 9,500 to 3,600), while filings for Community Designs rose from zero to 63,000 in the same period.

UKIPO v EUIPO Design Trend Applications v2

Data sources: EUIPO annual reports; UK IPO annual reports


However, what the headline figures don’t show is that this decline in UK design filings was almost entirely due to a drop in applications originating from outside the UK. In effect, the UK design registration system became almost entirely domestic. The lowest-ever proportion of non-domestic UK design filing recorded was in 2012, coming in at just 3.5%. What’s also interesting is that his stagnation came to an end in 2015, when UK design application filings began to rise significantly. So, what accounts for this rebound?

Inflection point

The likely cause of the initial inflection was the launch of the UK IPO’s online design application system in September 2015. This made filing for UK design protection much simpler.

This was followed by a consultation on design fees in 2016, undertaken when the UK IPO realised that its filing fees were not competitive when compared against those for filing Registered Community Designs (RCDs). A new scheme for filing fees entered into force on 1 October 2016, which significantly reduced the fees for filling multiple applications – and might account for the increase in filings in 2017 and beyond.

Brexit effect?

Of course, we should not forget the possible effect of the Brexit referendum in 2016. Although most responsible attorneys were advising from very early on that dual filing seemed unnecessary (advice supported by the progress made in the Brexit negotiations throughout 2017 and 2018), the small rise in the number of non-resident filings over this period could perhaps be attributable to a ‘Brexit effect’.

“It will be interesting to see how the relative numbers of filings sit after a few more years. Will the number of designs filed in the UK reach 50% of EU filings by 2025?”

By 2018, the number of UK design filings had reached a quarter of the number of EU design filings, and it will be interesting to see how the relative numbers of UK and EU filings sit after a few more years. We can only expect the number of filings in the UK to rise, whether directly or via the Hague system, which contributed more than 3,000 filings in 2019. It will be interesting to see how the relative number of filings will change over the next few years.

Superior features

In fact, the UK registered design system currently has a number of features that could be seen to make it superior to the RCD system. These include:

  • A higher limit on the number of representations in a single design (12 for UK online filing vs seven for RCD filing), which makes it easier to depict complex designs;
  • No requirement for unity of Locarno class for multiple designs, which makes it easier for applicants to file a multiple design application, even if the products are classified differently; and
  • No push towards a pre-approved list of product indications, which can sometimes cause issues in the RCD process.

With a review of the RCD legislation by the European Commission currently ongoing, we can perhaps expect some of these features to be incorporated into RCD filings. It is even possible that future changes to the RCD system will need to be imported into the UK filing regime to keep the systems aligned.

This means we are entering an exciting time for a reinvigorated UK design system – with the prospect of change always on the horizon.

Robert is a Partner and Patent Attorney at Mewburn Ellis and handles patent work in our chemistry team. Dealing mainly with drafting and prosecuting and advising on global portfolio management and invention capture, he has particular experience in the pharmaceutical and industrial chemistry sectors. He is also a leading member of our designs team. Robert is a member Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO), and Vice-President of FICPI’s Work and Study Commission (CET) in which capacities he meets the European Commission, EPO, EUIPO, WIPO and other patent offices. He is also a member of the Designs and Copyright committee of CIPA and represents FICPI-UK on the Marks and Designs Forum (MDF). He regularly speaks at conferences on a variety of topics including design law, entitlement to priority and privilege.
Comments

Sign up to our newsletter: Forward - news, insights and features

Our People

Our IP specialists work at all stage of the IP life cycle and provide strategic advice about patent, trade mark and registered designs, as well as any IP-related disputes and legal and commercial requirements.

OUR PEOPLE

Contact Us

We have an easily-accessible office in central London, as well as a number of regional offices throughout the UK and an office in Munich, Germany.  We’d love to hear from you, so please get in touch.