Nucleic Acid

Therapeutics

We work with companies and research institutions around the world to protect innovation in nucleic acid-based therapeutics, both in the field of gene therapy and more broadly.

We have worked with clients in the gene therapy space to protect approaches to correction of genetic abnormality, e.g. as exemplified by exon skipping technology for the treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. We have also been at the forefront of IP for targeted gene editing, as exemplified by CRISPR techniques. We also work with a number of clients to protect nucleic acid-based technologies aimed at the downregulation of expression of genetic information. Often exemplified by the concept of antisense sequences, this area is complex and comes in different forms, such as RISC-mediated gene silencing represented by RNAi or RNase H mediated gene silencing represented by gapmers. Advances in sequencing have also opened up the field of potential targets. For example, RNASeq and similar techniques have revealed the transcriptome of long non-coding RNAs that may influence expression of associated genes, and we have been involved in seeking broad platform level protection in this area.

We are also active in helping our clients protect viral vectors and RNA vaccines, which are clearly important and topical in view of the therapies approved to protect against COVID-19.

The development of SELEX revealed a different application of nucleic acids through the identification of aptamers. Typically short in length, these nucleic acids are selected for their high affinity binding to a chosen target and provide an alternative to monoclonal antibodies. Mewburn Ellis were the lead European patent attorneys involved in obtaining protection for this important class of molecule.

Alongside these approaches, developments in nucleotide chemistry, conjugation and encapsulation have helped address problems of delivery to target cells and extension of in vivo half-life, and we help clients to obtain important protection in these areas.

opps-report-1-1-1

Opposition Trends in the Life Sciences Sector

Special Report

In spring 2019, Mewburn Ellis undertook 350 hours of research, analysing more than 5,000 opposition cases filed at the European Patent Office over the last ten years, studying the timelines for hundreds of life sciences oppositions both before and after the EPO’s opposition streamlining initiative.

View the 2020 addendum for this report, based on information as it appeared on the EPO Register on 10 January 2021 and from bulk data sets extracted on this date.

 

Download the Report

Read our blogs

UPC Weekly - Three darts all miss – PI based on three patents refused due to validity concerns and insufficient proof of infringement

UPC Weekly - Three darts all miss – PI based on three patents refused due to validity concerns and insufficient proof of infringement

by Eliot Ward

2026 Week 5 For good or bad, it is now clear that inter partes preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC end up being mini-trials of the substantive issues. In Guardant Health v. Sophia ...

Round up of recent EPO Board of Appeal decisions relating to antibodies

Round up of recent EPO Board of Appeal decisions relating to antibodies

by Joanna Cripps

We have carried out our annual review of EPO Board of Appeal decisions published up to the end of 2025 where the claimed subject matter relates to antibodies. We have selected those decisions that ...

Most opposed patents of 2025

Most opposed patents of 2025

by Katherine Green

Writing this year’s overview prompted déjà vu and a quick check of 2024’s most opposed patents confirmed that the same innovators feature at the top of the list: patents in the name of Novartis (for ...

UPC Weekly -  Limits on jurisdiction outside the UPC when invalidity looms

UPC Weekly -  Limits on jurisdiction outside the UPC when invalidity looms

by Matthew Naylor

2026 Week 4 The extent of the jurisdiction asserted by the UPC is a hot topic at the moment. On 22 January 2026, the UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) held the oral hearing in the appeal against the ...

UPC Weekly -  Purpose-based interpretation avoids infringement of medical device claim but defendant still on the hook for costs

UPC Weekly -  Purpose-based interpretation avoids infringement of medical device claim but defendant still on the hook for costs

by Matthew Naylor

2026 Week 3 Being sued for patent infringement at the UPC is a full-on experience. The front-loading of the procedure and the urgent time limits mean that far-reaching strategic decisions need to be ...

Front loading and pointers to the solution – the view from the UPC Court of Appeal

Front loading and pointers to the solution – the view from the UPC Court of Appeal

by Matthew Naylor

2026 Week 2 After the Edwards and Amgen decisions in late November 2025, we now have a further UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) decision, reviewing the outcome of first instance revocation proceedings at ...

Forward Magazines Overlapping 6-compressed

Mewburn Ellis

FORWARD MAGAZINE

Mewburn Ellis Forward is a biannual publication that celebrates the best of innovation and exploration. Through its pages we hope to inform and entertain, but also to encourage discussion about the most compelling developments taking place in the scientific and entrepreneurial world. Along the way, we’ll engage with the IP challenges that international organisations face every day.