Simon Kiddle - August 20, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: we helped clear a new path to patenting dosage regimes Case 10 – T 1020/03 (EPO Board of Appeal, 29 October 2004)
Seán Walton - July 24, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: novelty of a patient sub-population Case 9 – T 734/12 (EPO Board of Appeal, 17 May 2013)
Simon Kiddle - June 29, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: we helped determine the meaning of “surgery” Case 8 – T 1695/07 (EPO Board of Appeal, 28 September 2011)
Simon Kiddle - May 18, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: We helped shape the debate on medical use claim patentability Case 7 – T 879/12 (EPO Board of Appeal, 27 August 2014)
Simon Kiddle - April 27, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: We moved the conversation on animal involvement Case 6 – T 1262/04 (EPO Board of Appeal, 13 July 2012)
Seán Walton - March 12, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: We set the standard for the strawman Case 5 - T 649/92 (EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal, 2 July 1996)
Richard Clegg - February 12, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: we opened the door for different types of data to support a medical use Case 4 - T 801/06 (EPO Board of Appeal, 4 March 2009)
Simon Kiddle - January 29, 2020 Oppositions & Appeals: We made the case for a new technical effect Case 3 - T 1642/06 (EPO Board of Appeal, 23 August 2007)
Seán Walton - November 11, 2019 Oppositions a case to remember: we forced a fuller view of technical features Case 1 – T 1859/08 ( EPO Board of Appeal, 5 June 2016)
Katherine Green - October 30, 2019 Oppositions - a case to remember. Flexibility around added matter Case 2 – T 0099/13 (EPO Board of Appeal, 14 January 2016)